Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Demo · hover to play
Augment Code vs Magic.devwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
Augment Code vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Augment Code
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Augment Code
Magic.dev
Pros
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
Cons
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
Augment Code
Magic.dev
Enterprise
Custom
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Augment Code
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Augment Code →Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Magic.dev?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Magic.dev also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryDemo · hover to playGitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemoryDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Augment Code · alternatives to Magic.dev
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison