Open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing autonomous AI agents in collaborative crews.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to play
AutoGen vs Devinwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory
AutoGen vs Devin — specs
| Spec | AutoGen | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 78 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $500 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Code, Memory | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Devin
Agent Rank
78/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
AutoGen
Devin
Pros
- +Highest autonomy in the coding category — ships PRs end-to-end with minimal oversight
- +Iterates on failing tests until they pass; explains what it did in the PR description
- +Multi-agent UI for managing parallel sessions
Cons
- −Pricing puts it firmly in team territory — overkill for solo founders
- −Will ship working code that's wrong for your codebase if architectural context is missing
- −Session memory weak past hour-long stretches
Pricing
AutoGen
Devin
Core
$500/mo
Small teams
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Slack + GitHub + Linear integrations
- +10 concurrent sessions
- +Email support
Recommended
Team
$1500/mo
Engineering teams
- +Everything in Core
- +Priority queue
- +40 concurrent sessions
- +SSO
- +Shared knowledge base
Enterprise
Custom
Large orgs
- +Custom concurrency
- +Dedicated VPC option
- +SOC 2 II reports
- +Onboarding engineer
Which one should you pick?
AutoGen
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try AutoGen →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick AutoGen or Devin in 2026?+
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Devin if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Devin for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between AutoGen and Devin?+
AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Devin starts at Subscription · from $500. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Devin?+
Both AutoGen and Devin are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing AutoGen and Devin also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
LangChain's stateful multi-agent framework — graph-based orchestration with persistence and human-in-the-loop.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's lightweight multi-agent reference implementation — handoff + routine patterns, educational.
Multi-agentTool use
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to AutoGen · alternatives to Devin
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison