Open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing autonomous AI agents in collaborative crews.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to play
AutoGen vs Magic.devwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory
AutoGen vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | AutoGen | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Code, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
AutoGen
Magic.dev
Pros
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
Cons
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
AutoGen
Magic.dev
Enterprise
Custom
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
AutoGen
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try AutoGen →Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick AutoGen or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Magic.dev if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between AutoGen and Magic.dev?+
AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Magic.dev?+
Both AutoGen and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing AutoGen and Magic.dev also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
LangChain's stateful multi-agent framework — graph-based orchestration with persistence and human-in-the-loop.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's lightweight multi-agent reference implementation — handoff + routine patterns, educational.
Multi-agentTool use
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to AutoGen · alternatives to Magic.dev
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison