Adept vs Fireflies.ai: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Conversation-intelligence agent for sales and CS — transcribes, scores, and syncs calls to your CRM.
Adept vs Fireflies.ai — specs
| Spec | Adept | Fireflies.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $10 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Voice, RAG, Memory, Tool use |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Strongest conversation-intelligence and CRM integration in the category
- +60+ languages of transcription, leading the category for global teams
- +Generous free tier (800 min/mo) — easy to evaluate before buying
- −Less polished personal note-taking UX than Otter
- −Sentiment analysis still occasionally misclassifies sarcasm or context
- −Privacy controls require careful configuration per meeting
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +800 min/mo
- +AI summaries
- +8000 min/mo
- +60+ languages
- +CRM sync
- +Conversation intelligence
- +Topic tracking
- +Advanced analytics
- +Unlimited transcription
- +SSO
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Fireflies.ai if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Fireflies.ai →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Fireflies.ai in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Fireflies.ai if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Fireflies.ai for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Fireflies.ai?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Fireflies.ai starts at Freemium · from $10. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Fireflies.ai?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.