Adept vs Lavender: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Lavender — specs
| Spec | Adept | Lavender |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 65 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Real-time email scoring inside Gmail/Outlook genuinely improves cold-email reply rates
- +Used by tens of thousands of SDRs — battle-tested in real outbound
- +Manager dashboards make team-wide email coaching measurable
- −Augments humans rather than automating outbound end-to-end
- −Best for teams using a real engagement platform (Salesloft/Outreach) underneath
- −Browser extension UX occasionally lags on heavy email days
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +5 emails/mo
- +Basic scoring
- +Unlimited scoring
- +Real-time coaching
- +Personalization data
- +Team coaching analytics
- +Manager dashboards
- +Custom playbooks
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Lavender if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Lavender →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Lavender in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Lavender if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Lavender for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Lavender?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Lavender starts at Subscription · from $29. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Lavender?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.