Adept vs Linear Agent: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
AI agent inside Linear — triages issues, drafts engineering specs, runs cross-team workflows on tickets.
Adept vs Linear Agent — specs
| Spec | Adept | Linear Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $8 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Native to Linear — zero extra setup for teams already using it
- +Triage and spec-drafting genuinely save time on issue grooming
- +Pricing folds AI features into the existing Linear seat
- −Only useful if you live in Linear
- −Less powerful than dedicated coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code) for code work
- −Agent autonomy bounded by Linear-specific tasks
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Basic Linear
- +Limited AI features
- +Full Linear + AI Agent
- +Issue triage
- +Spec drafting
- +SAML SSO
- +SCIM
- +Advanced analytics
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Linear Agent if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Linear Agent →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Linear Agent in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Linear Agent if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Linear Agent for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Linear Agent?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Linear Agent starts at Subscription · from $8. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Linear Agent?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.