Adept vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Adept | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Adept if its specific capabilities (Browser, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Magic.dev?+
Both Adept and Magic.dev start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Magic.dev?+
Both Adept and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.