Adept vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Adept vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Adept | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.