aiagentrank.io

Adept vs Sweep: 2026 comparison

Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.

⚙️OpsAutonomousSubscription
BrowserTool useMemoryVision

GitHub-native agent that turns issues into reviewed pull requests.

💻CodeAutonomousFreemium · from $30
CodeTool useMemory

Adept vs Sweep — specs

SpecAdeptSweep
Agent Rank67 / 100 (B)58 / 100 (B)
AutonomyAutonomousAutonomous
PricingSubscription · Free tierFreemium · from $30
Open sourceNoYes
CapabilitiesBrowser, Tool use, Memory, VisionCode, Tool use, Memory
Integrations3 apps1 apps
Verified
ReleasedApr 2025Mar 2025

Categories: AdeptOps · SweepCode

Agent Rank breakdown

Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomy fit
9
Capabilities
8
Integrations
4
Pricing value
9
Polish & maturity
4
Verifiability
6

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Sweep
Agent Rank
58/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomy fit
9
Capabilities
6
Integrations
2
Pricing value
7
Polish & maturity
5
Verifiability
6

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Pros & cons

Adept
Pros
  • +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
  • +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
  • +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
Cons
  • Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
  • Pricing not public
  • Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Sweep
Pros
  • +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
  • +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
  • +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
Cons
  • Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
  • No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
  • Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks

Pricing

Adept
Enterprise preview
Custom
Enterprise pilots
  • +Browser-driving agent
  • +Custom workflow training
  • +Dedicated research-eng support
Sweep
Free
Free
Personal repos
  • +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
  • +Public repos only
Recommended
Starter
$30/mo
Small teams
  • +Unlimited runs
  • +Private repos
  • +Configurable rules
Enterprise
Custom
Larger orgs
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SAML SSO
  • +Dedicated support

Which one should you pick?

Adept

Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint.

Try Adept →
Sweep

Pick Sweep if auditability or self-hosting matters.

Try Sweep →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Adept or Sweep in 2026?+

Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sweep if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Adept and Sweep?+

Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sweep?+

Both Adept and Sweep are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.

Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison