aiagentrank.io

Adept vs Tines AI: 2026 comparison

Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.

⚙️OpsAutonomousSubscription
BrowserTool useMemoryVision

Security and IT workflow agents with human-in-the-loop gates — the no-code platform for SOC + ITOps.

⚙️OpsSemi-autonomousSubscription
Tool useMemory

Adept vs Tines AI — specs

SpecAdeptTines AI
Agent Rank67 / 100 (B)73 / 100 (A)
AutonomyAutonomousSemi-autonomous
PricingSubscription · Free tierSubscription · Free tier
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesBrowser, Tool use, Memory, VisionTool use, Memory
Integrations3 apps4 apps
VerifiedVerified
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2025

Categories: AdeptOps · Tines AIOps

Agent Rank breakdown

Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomy fit
9
Capabilities
8
Integrations
4
Pricing value
9
Polish & maturity
4
Verifiability
6

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Tines AI
Agent Rank
73/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomy fit
8
Capabilities
4
Integrations
8
Pricing value
9
Polish & maturity
5
Verifiability
10

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Pros & cons

Adept
Pros
  • +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
  • +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
  • +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
Cons
  • Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
  • Pricing not public
  • Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Tines AI
Pros
  • +Strongest human-in-the-loop story for security and IT workflows
  • +Generous free tier (Community) is genuinely usable in production
  • +Story-based composer is easier to read than YAML/JSON IaC alternatives
Cons
  • Narrower scope than Zapier / n8n — built for SecOps + ITOps, less for marketing
  • Sales-led above Community tier; pricing not transparent
  • AI agent features are newer than the core automation product

Pricing

Adept
Enterprise preview
Custom
Enterprise pilots
  • +Browser-driving agent
  • +Custom workflow training
  • +Dedicated research-eng support
Tines AI
Community
Free
Solo + small SOC
  • +Unlimited workflows
  • +Community connectors
  • +Public-cloud only
Recommended
Standard
Custom
Mid-market
  • +Production support
  • +Custom connectors
  • +On-prem option
Enterprise
Custom
Enterprise SOC
  • +Multi-region
  • +SSO + audit
  • +Premium support SLA

Which one should you pick?

Adept

Pick Adept if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try Adept →
Tines AI

Pick Tines AI if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.

Try Tines AI →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Adept or Tines AI in 2026?+

Pick Adept if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Tines AI if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Adept and Tines AI?+

Both Adept and Tines AI start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.

Which is more autonomous, Adept or Tines AI?+

Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison