Open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing autonomous AI agents in collaborative crews.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to play
AutoGen vs Dustwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory
AutoGen vs Dust — specs
| Spec | AutoGen | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Code, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing
- 10
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
AutoGen
Dust
Pros
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
Cons
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Pricing
AutoGen
Dust
Free
Free
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
Recommended
Pro
$29/seat/mo
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
Custom
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
AutoGen
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try AutoGen →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick AutoGen or Dust in 2026?+
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Dust for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between AutoGen and Dust?+
AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Dust starts at Subscription · from $29. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Dust?+
AutoGen is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing AutoGen and Dust also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
LangChain's stateful multi-agent framework — graph-based orchestration with persistence and human-in-the-loop.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's lightweight multi-agent reference implementation — handoff + routine patterns, educational.
Multi-agentTool use
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to AutoGen · alternatives to Dust
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison