Devin vs Linear Agent: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI software engineer that ships PRs end-to-end.
AI agent inside Linear — triages issues, drafts engineering specs, runs cross-team workflows on tickets.
Devin vs Linear Agent — specs
| Spec | Devin | Linear Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $500 | Subscription · from $8 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory | Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Highest autonomy in the coding category — ships PRs end-to-end with minimal oversight
- +Iterates on failing tests until they pass; explains what it did in the PR description
- +Multi-agent UI for managing parallel sessions
- −Pricing puts it firmly in team territory — overkill for solo founders
- −Will ship working code that's wrong for your codebase if architectural context is missing
- −Session memory weak past hour-long stretches
- +Native to Linear — zero extra setup for teams already using it
- +Triage and spec-drafting genuinely save time on issue grooming
- +Pricing folds AI features into the existing Linear seat
- −Only useful if you live in Linear
- −Less powerful than dedicated coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code) for code work
- −Agent autonomy bounded by Linear-specific tasks
Pricing
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Slack + GitHub + Linear integrations
- +10 concurrent sessions
- +Email support
- +Everything in Core
- +Priority queue
- +40 concurrent sessions
- +SSO
- +Shared knowledge base
- +Custom concurrency
- +Dedicated VPC option
- +SOC 2 II reports
- +Onboarding engineer
- +Basic Linear
- +Limited AI features
- +Full Linear + AI Agent
- +Issue triage
- +Spec drafting
- +SAML SSO
- +SCIM
- +Advanced analytics
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Devin or Linear Agent in 2026?+
Pick Devin if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Linear Agent if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Devin for primary work and Linear Agent for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Devin and Linear Agent?+
Devin starts at Subscription · from $500; Linear Agent starts at Subscription · from $8. Linear Agent is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Devin or Linear Agent?+
Devin is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.