Devin vs Make.com Agents: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI software engineer that ships PRs end-to-end.
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Devin vs Make.com Agents — specs
| Spec | Devin | Make.com Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 83 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $500 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 8 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Highest autonomy in the coding category — ships PRs end-to-end with minimal oversight
- +Iterates on failing tests until they pass; explains what it did in the PR description
- +Multi-agent UI for managing parallel sessions
- −Pricing puts it firmly in team territory — overkill for solo founders
- −Will ship working code that's wrong for your codebase if architectural context is missing
- −Session memory weak past hour-long stretches
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
Pricing
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Slack + GitHub + Linear integrations
- +10 concurrent sessions
- +Email support
- +Everything in Core
- +Priority queue
- +40 concurrent sessions
- +SSO
- +Shared knowledge base
- +Custom concurrency
- +Dedicated VPC option
- +SOC 2 II reports
- +Onboarding engineer
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Devin or Make.com Agents in 2026?+
Pick Devin if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Most working teams running both can use Devin for primary work and Make.com Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Devin and Make.com Agents?+
Devin starts at Subscription · from $500; Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Devin or Make.com Agents?+
Devin is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.