Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Dust vs Magicalwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Dust vs Magical — specs
| Spec | Dust | Magical |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Freemium · from $6 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Browser, Tool use |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2024 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Magical
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomy
- 7
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing
- 8
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Dust
Pros
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
Cons
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Magical
Pricing
Dust
Free
Free
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
Recommended
Pro
$29/seat/mo
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
Custom
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Magical
Which one should you pick?
Magical
Pick Magical if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magical →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Magical in 2026?+
Pick Dust if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Magical if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Magical for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Magical?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Magical starts at Freemium · from $6. Magical is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Magical?+
Dust is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Dust and Magical also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Demo · hover to playVisual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Dust · alternatives to Magical
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison