Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Dust vs Manuswhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Dust vs Manus — specs
| Spec | Dust | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 87 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Freemium · from $19 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Browser, Tool use, Code, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 10
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 8
- Polish
- 9
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
- +Produces a finished artifact, not just a brief — slide decks, market maps, briefs
- +Strong browser + tool use; handles multi-source synthesis cleanly
- +AGENTS20 coupon stacks with annual billing
- −Confident on topics where the expert answer is "it depends"
- −Cites occasional fabricated sources — verify any high-stakes claim
- −Premium model gating means heavy users hit the $49 tier fast
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
- +100 daily credits
- +Standard models
- +Browser + tool use
- +Unlimited credits
- +Premium models
- +Faster queue
- +Priority support
- +5 seats
- +Shared workspaces
- +Admin controls
Which one should you pick?
Pick Manus if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Claim AGENTS20Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Manus in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Manus if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Manus for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Manus?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Manus starts at Freemium · from $19. Manus is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Manus?+
Manus is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Dust and Manus also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Demo · hover to playVisual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to play