Fixie vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Build durable agents that act on your internal data — open framework.
Fixie vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Fixie | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Real multi-agent primitives — planner + workers + reviewer out of the box
- +Strong for internal-tool agents over your own data
- +Permissive license; auditable end-to-end
- −Framework, not a finished product — engineering effort to ship anything
- −Smaller community than LangChain / LlamaIndex
- −Cloud pricing not yet published — usage-based and opaque
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Apache-2.0 framework
- +Self-host
- +Bring your own models + data
- +Hosted runtime
- +Multi-agent orchestration
- +Observability
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Fixie →Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Fixie or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Fixie for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Fixie and Magic.dev?+
Fixie starts at Free · OSS; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Fixie is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Fixie or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.