Fixie vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Build durable agents that act on your internal data — open framework.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Fixie vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Fixie | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Real multi-agent primitives — planner + workers + reviewer out of the box
- +Strong for internal-tool agents over your own data
- +Permissive license; auditable end-to-end
- −Framework, not a finished product — engineering effort to ship anything
- −Smaller community than LangChain / LlamaIndex
- −Cloud pricing not yet published — usage-based and opaque
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Apache-2.0 framework
- +Self-host
- +Bring your own models + data
- +Hosted runtime
- +Multi-agent orchestration
- +Observability
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Fixie →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Fixie or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Fixie for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Fixie and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Fixie starts at Free · OSS; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Fixie is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Fixie or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Fixie and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.