Gemini Deep Research vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Long-running researcher inside Gemini that plans, browses and writes briefs.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Gemini Deep Research vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Gemini Deep Research | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $20 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, RAG, Memory, Vision | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Categories: Gemini Deep Research → Research · Sourcegraph Cody → Code
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Goes the deepest of any research agent — reads 30+ sources per brief
- +Strong on multi-hop reasoning; produces structured, well-cited drafts
- +Native integration with Google Workspace (Drive, Docs)
- −Slowest of the three big research agents — typical brief takes 20–40 min
- −Output is verbose; expect to cut 30–40% in editing
- −Less effective on paywalled academic literature than Elicit
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Deep Research mode
- +1M-token context
- +Workspace integrations
- +Gemini in Docs, Sheets, Gmail
- +Admin controls
- +Custom data controls
- +Vertex integration
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Gemini Deep Research if its specific capabilities (Browser, RAG) match what you need.
Try Gemini Deep Research →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Gemini Deep Research or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Gemini Deep Research if its specific capabilities (Browser, RAG) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Gemini Deep Research for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Gemini Deep Research and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Gemini Deep Research starts at Subscription · from $20; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Gemini Deep Research or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Gemini Deep Research and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.