Glean vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Enterprise AI worker — unified search, work assistant, and custom agents grounded in your company knowledge.
Glean vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Glean | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 80 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 6 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Single best enterprise knowledge agent in 2026 — instant grounding in your company data
- +Custom Agents (Glean Agents) let teams build internal workflows without code
- +Strong permission-aware retrieval — agents see only what users are allowed to
- −Enterprise-only — typically $50K+ ACV minimum
- −Initial connector setup takes weeks for full coverage
- −Pricier than ChatGPT Enterprise on a per-seat basis
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Unified search across 100+ apps
- +Work assistant + custom agents
- +SSO + enterprise data isolation
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Glean or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Glean if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Glean for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Glean and Magic.dev?+
Both Glean and Magic.dev start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Glean or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.