Glean vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Enterprise AI worker — unified search, work assistant, and custom agents grounded in your company knowledge.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Glean vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Glean | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 80 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 6 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Single best enterprise knowledge agent in 2026 — instant grounding in your company data
- +Custom Agents (Glean Agents) let teams build internal workflows without code
- +Strong permission-aware retrieval — agents see only what users are allowed to
- −Enterprise-only — typically $50K+ ACV minimum
- −Initial connector setup takes weeks for full coverage
- −Pricier than ChatGPT Enterprise on a per-seat basis
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Unified search across 100+ apps
- +Work assistant + custom agents
- +SSO + enterprise data isolation
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Glean or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Glean if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Glean for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Glean and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Glean starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Glean is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Glean or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Sourcegraph Cody is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.