Harvey AI vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI legal associate for law firms — drafts, reviews, and researches across complex matters.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Harvey AI vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Harvey AI | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Highest-quality legal-domain AI in 2026 — trained on actual legal work
- +Used by 350+ AmLaw firms; battle-tested in real matters
- +Strict data isolation — work product never leaves customer tenancy
- −Enterprise pricing only — no transparent SaaS pricing
- −Sales cycle is months; not a self-serve product
- −Still a junior associate by capability — humans own final work product
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +AI legal associate
- +Trained on legal corpora
- +iManage / NetDocs integration
- +SOC 2 II + ISO 27001
- +Everything in Firm
- +Dedicated VPC
- +Custom workflows
- +Privileged-data isolation
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Harvey AI or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Harvey AI if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Harvey AI for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Harvey AI and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Harvey AI starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Harvey AI is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Harvey AI or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Harvey AI and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.