Lindy vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Lindy vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Magic.dev?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Magic.dev?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.