Lindy vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Lindy vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Lindy and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.