Linear Agent vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI agent inside Linear — triages issues, drafts engineering specs, runs cross-team workflows on tickets.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Linear Agent vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Linear Agent | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $8 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Native to Linear — zero extra setup for teams already using it
- +Triage and spec-drafting genuinely save time on issue grooming
- +Pricing folds AI features into the existing Linear seat
- −Only useful if you live in Linear
- −Less powerful than dedicated coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code) for code work
- −Agent autonomy bounded by Linear-specific tasks
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Basic Linear
- +Limited AI features
- +Full Linear + AI Agent
- +Issue triage
- +Spec drafting
- +SAML SSO
- +SCIM
- +Advanced analytics
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Linear Agent or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Linear Agent if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Linear Agent for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Linear Agent and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Linear Agent starts at Subscription · from $8; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Linear Agent is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Linear Agent or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Linear Agent and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.