Magic.dev vs Manus: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Magic.dev vs Manus — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 87 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $19 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Browser, Tool use, Code, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 10
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 9
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Produces a finished artifact, not just a brief — slide decks, market maps, briefs
- +Strong browser + tool use; handles multi-source synthesis cleanly
- +AGENTS20 coupon stacks with annual billing
- −Confident on topics where the expert answer is "it depends"
- −Cites occasional fabricated sources — verify any high-stakes claim
- −Premium model gating means heavy users hit the $49 tier fast
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +100 daily credits
- +Standard models
- +Browser + tool use
- +Unlimited credits
- +Premium models
- +Faster queue
- +Priority support
- +5 seats
- +Shared workspaces
- +Admin controls
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Manus in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Pick Manus if its specific capabilities (Browser, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Manus for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Manus?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; Manus starts at Freemium · from $19. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Manus?+
Both Magic.dev and Manus are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.