Magic.dev vs Martin: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Your personal AI chief of staff for inbox, calendar and life admin.
Magic.dev vs Martin — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 70 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Voice |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +AGENTS15 coupon makes the math obvious — $21/mo forever
- +Strong on Apple ecosystem (iMessage native)
- +Voice-memo intake feels effortless on iOS
- −Microsoft 365 integration is the weak spot
- −No team plan; truly a personal assistant only
- −Limited custom workflow builder vs Lindy
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +Inbox + calendar
- +Voice memo intake
- +iMessage integration
- +AGENTS15 coupon: $21/mo forever
- +Higher message limits
- +Custom workflows
- +Priority support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Claim AGENTS15Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Martin in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Martin for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Martin?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; Martin starts at Subscription · from $25. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Martin?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.