Magic.dev vs n8n Agents: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI agent nodes — self-host or use cloud.
Magic.dev vs n8n Agents — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | n8n Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 85 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 6 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Strongest OSS workflow automation in 2026 — production-ready at any scale
- +Self-host keeps proprietary data on your infra
- +Multi-agent + AI agent nodes are first-class, not bolted on
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Cloud pricing is competitive but self-host operational overhead is real
- −Community support primary; commercial SLA is paid tier
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +Apache-2.0 fair-use license
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Full agent node support
- +Hosted runtime
- +Active workflows
- +BYO LLM key supported
- +10K executions/mo
- +Multi-user
- +Workflow versioning
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try n8n Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or n8n Agents in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and n8n Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and n8n Agents?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; n8n Agents starts at Free · OSS. n8n Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or n8n Agents?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.