Magic.dev vs Numeric: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Magic.dev vs Numeric — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Numeric |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Pick Numeric if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Numeric →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Numeric in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Numeric if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Numeric for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Numeric?+
Both Magic.dev and Numeric start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Numeric?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.