Magic.dev vs Sweep: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Magic.dev vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | May 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sweep if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Sweep?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Sweep?+
Both Magic.dev and Sweep are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.