Magic.dev vs Tines AI: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
Magic.dev vs Tines AI — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Tines AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
- +Strongest human-in-the-loop story for security and IT workflows
- +Generous free tier (Community) is genuinely usable in production
- +Story-based composer is easier to read than YAML/JSON IaC alternatives
- −Narrower scope than Zapier / n8n — built for SecOps + ITOps, less for marketing
- −Sales-led above Community tier; pricing not transparent
- −AI agent features are newer than the core automation product
Pricing
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Community connectors
- +Public-cloud only
- +Production support
- +Custom connectors
- +On-prem option
- +Multi-region
- +SSO + audit
- +Premium support SLA
Which one should you pick?
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Magic.dev →Pick Tines AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Tines AI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Tines AI in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Tines AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Tines AI?+
Both Magic.dev and Tines AI start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Tines AI?+
Magic.dev is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.