Make.com Agents vs Martin: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Your personal AI chief of staff for inbox, calendar and life admin.
Make.com Agents vs Martin — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 70 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Voice |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +AGENTS15 coupon makes the math obvious — $21/mo forever
- +Strong on Apple ecosystem (iMessage native)
- +Voice-memo intake feels effortless on iOS
- −Microsoft 365 integration is the weak spot
- −No team plan; truly a personal assistant only
- −Limited custom workflow builder vs Lindy
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Inbox + calendar
- +Voice memo intake
- +iMessage integration
- +AGENTS15 coupon: $21/mo forever
- +Higher message limits
- +Custom workflows
- +Priority support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Claim AGENTS15Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Martin in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Martin if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Martin for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Martin?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Martin starts at Subscription · from $25. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Martin?+
Both Make.com Agents and Martin are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.