Make.com Agents vs Mem Agents: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Self-organizing memory agent that captures and surfaces what matters.
Make.com Agents vs Mem Agents — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Mem Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 70 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $10 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Memory, RAG, Tool use |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Self-organizing memory — surfaces what matters without manual tagging
- +Strong agent search across email, Slack, Drive
- +Cheap entry tier for a daily-driver knowledge layer
- −Acts as memory, not action — pair with another agent for execution
- −Integration depth varies by app
- −Team features still maturing vs Notion / Mem.ai competitors
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +1,000 memories
- +Standard search
- +Unlimited memories
- +Agent search
- +Integrations
- +Shared memories
- +Workspace controls
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Mem Agents if its specific capabilities (Memory, RAG) match what you need.
Try Mem Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Mem Agents in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Mem Agents if its specific capabilities (Memory, RAG) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Mem Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Mem Agents?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Mem Agents starts at Freemium · from $10. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Mem Agents?+
Make.com Agents is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.