Make.com Agents vs MultiOn: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Make.com Agents vs MultiOn — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | MultiOn |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 63 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $20 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Browser, Tool use, Vision, Memory |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Consumer-friendly browser agent that books, fills, and completes web tasks autonomously
- +API lets developers embed browser-agent capabilities in their own products
- +Chrome extension keeps the agent close to where users already work
- −Reliability varies widely across websites — 5–15% error rate typical
- −Best for low-stakes workflows; not for production payments or critical ops
- −Voice quality + multimodal features still maturing
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Limited daily sessions
- +Single agent
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Custom agents
- +API access
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick MultiOn if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try MultiOn →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or MultiOn in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick MultiOn if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and MultiOn for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and MultiOn?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; MultiOn starts at Freemium · from $20. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or MultiOn?+
MultiOn is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.