Make.com Agents vs Reclaim.ai: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
AI calendar assistant — auto-schedules focus time, tasks, habits, and meetings around your priorities.
Make.com Agents vs Reclaim.ai — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $10 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Smartest auto-scheduler we have tested — defends focus time aggressively
- +Integrations with task tools (Asana, Linear, Todoist) make it a real planning hub
- +Free tier is genuinely useful for personal users
- −Calendar-only scope — does not handle email or task generation
- −Best for Google Workspace users; Outlook support is newer
- −Team rituals feature requires manager buy-in to land
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Basic habits + tasks
- +1 calendar
- +Smart 1:1s
- +Tasks integrations
- +Multiple calendars
- +Team rituals
- +Smart scheduling links
- +Admin controls
- +SSO
- +Audit logs
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Reclaim.ai if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Reclaim.ai →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Reclaim.ai in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Reclaim.ai if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Reclaim.ai for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Reclaim.ai?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Reclaim.ai starts at Freemium · from $10. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Reclaim.ai?+
Both Make.com Agents and Reclaim.ai are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.