Make.com Agents vs Wordware: 2026 comparison
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Make.com Agents vs Wordware — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Wordware |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 83 / 100 (A) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent, RAG |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +Document-like UI makes building agent workflows intuitive for non-engineers
- +Strong template library — copy a working workflow and modify
- +Genuinely useful for prototyping multi-step agent logic before coding it
- −Production-grade deployments still benefit from custom code
- −Pricing tiers can be confusing as workflows scale
- −Less polished observability than purpose-built agent platforms
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Public workflows only
- +Community templates
- +Private workflows
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom integrations
- +Shared workspace
- +Role-based access
- +API export
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Wordware →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Wordware in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Wordware for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Wordware?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Wordware starts at Freemium · from $29. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Wordware?+
Both Make.com Agents and Wordware are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.