n8n Agents vs Sweep: 2026 comparison
Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI agent nodes — self-host or use cloud.
n8n Agents vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | n8n Agents | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 85 / 100 (S) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 6 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Strongest OSS workflow automation in 2026 — production-ready at any scale
- +Self-host keeps proprietary data on your infra
- +Multi-agent + AI agent nodes are first-class, not bolted on
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Cloud pricing is competitive but self-host operational overhead is real
- −Community support primary; commercial SLA is paid tier
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
- +Apache-2.0 fair-use license
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Full agent node support
- +Hosted runtime
- +Active workflows
- +BYO LLM key supported
- +10K executions/mo
- +Multi-user
- +Workflow versioning
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try n8n Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick n8n Agents or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use n8n Agents for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between n8n Agents and Sweep?+
n8n Agents starts at Free · OSS; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. n8n Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, n8n Agents or Sweep?+
Sweep is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.