Numeric vs Shortwave: 2026 comparison
AI controller — autonomous month-end close, reconciliations, flux analysis and variance commentary.
AI email client — natural-language search, summary, scheduled send, and AI-drafted replies grounded in your inbox.
Numeric vs Shortwave — specs
| Spec | Numeric | Shortwave |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | RAG, Memory, Tool use |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
- +Best AI-native email client in 2026 — search, summarize, draft all natural-language
- +Built specifically for Gmail; faster + smarter than Gmail itself
- +Cheap relative to Superhuman with better AI features
- −Gmail-only — no Outlook support
- −AI assistant is helpful but not yet revolutionary
- −Smaller user base means fewer integrations than Gmail/Outlook ecosystems
Pricing
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
- +Basic AI summary
- +90-day search
- +Unlimited search
- +AI assistant
- +Scheduled send
- +Shared inboxes
- +Send delegation
- +Admin controls
Which one should you pick?
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Numeric →Pick Shortwave if its specific capabilities (RAG, Memory) match what you need.
Try Shortwave →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Numeric or Shortwave in 2026?+
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Shortwave if its specific capabilities (RAG, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Numeric for primary work and Shortwave for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Numeric and Shortwave?+
Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier; Shortwave starts at Freemium · from $9. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Numeric or Shortwave?+
Numeric is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.