Numeric vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI controller — autonomous month-end close, reconciliations, flux analysis and variance commentary.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Numeric vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Numeric | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Numeric or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Numeric for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Numeric and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Numeric or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Numeric and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.