Numeric vs Sweep: 2026 comparison
AI controller — autonomous month-end close, reconciliations, flux analysis and variance commentary.
Numeric vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | Numeric | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Numeric →Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Sweep →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Numeric or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Numeric for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Numeric and Sweep?+
Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Numeric or Sweep?+
Sweep is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.