Phind vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
AI search engine for developers — answers technical questions with code-first results and citations.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Phind vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Phind | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $20 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, RAG, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 1 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best dev-focused AI search — code-first results with citations
- +Citations are real and current; less hallucination than ChatGPT for code
- +VS Code extension brings Phind into the editor
- −Smaller index than Perplexity for non-dev queries
- −Best as a complement to a coding agent, not a replacement
- −Free tier limits make heavy daily use painful
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Limited Pro searches/day
- +Standard models
- +Unlimited Pro searches
- +Frontier model access
- +Custom Phind agents
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Phind or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Phind if its specific capabilities (Browser, RAG) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Phind for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Phind and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Phind starts at Freemium · from $20; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Phind or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Sourcegraph Cody is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.