Sourcegraph Cody vs Sweep: 2026 comparison
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Sourcegraph Cody vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Sweep →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Sweep?+
Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Sweep?+
Sweep is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.