Sourcegraph Cody vs Tines AI: 2026 comparison
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tines AI — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Tines AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 4
- Integrations
- 8
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
- +Strongest human-in-the-loop story for security and IT workflows
- +Generous free tier (Community) is genuinely usable in production
- +Story-based composer is easier to read than YAML/JSON IaC alternatives
- −Narrower scope than Zapier / n8n — built for SecOps + ITOps, less for marketing
- −Sales-led above Community tier; pricing not transparent
- −AI agent features are newer than the core automation product
Pricing
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Community connectors
- +Public-cloud only
- +Production support
- +Custom connectors
- +On-prem option
- +Multi-region
- +SSO + audit
- +Premium support SLA
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Tines AI in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Tines AI if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Tines AI?+
Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Tines AI starts at Subscription · Free tier. Tines AI is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Tines AI?+
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Tines AI are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.