Sourcegraph Cody vs Wordware: 2026 comparison
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Sourcegraph Cody vs Wordware — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Wordware |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
- +Document-like UI makes building agent workflows intuitive for non-engineers
- +Strong template library — copy a working workflow and modify
- +Genuinely useful for prototyping multi-step agent logic before coding it
- −Production-grade deployments still benefit from custom code
- −Pricing tiers can be confusing as workflows scale
- −Less polished observability than purpose-built agent platforms
Pricing
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
- +Public workflows only
- +Community templates
- +Private workflows
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom integrations
- +Shared workspace
- +Role-based access
- +API export
Which one should you pick?
Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Wordware →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Wordware in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Wordware for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Wordware?+
Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Wordware starts at Freemium · from $29. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Wordware?+
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Wordware are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.