Sweep vs Wordware: 2026 comparison
GitHub-native agent that turns issues into reviewed pull requests.
Sweep vs Wordware — specs
| Spec | Sweep | Wordware |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 58 / 100 (B) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Freemium · from $29 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent, RAG |
| Integrations | 1 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
- +Document-like UI makes building agent workflows intuitive for non-engineers
- +Strong template library — copy a working workflow and modify
- +Genuinely useful for prototyping multi-step agent logic before coding it
- −Production-grade deployments still benefit from custom code
- −Pricing tiers can be confusing as workflows scale
- −Less polished observability than purpose-built agent platforms
Pricing
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
- +Public workflows only
- +Community templates
- +Private workflows
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom integrations
- +Shared workspace
- +Role-based access
- +API export
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Sweep →Pick Wordware if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Wordware →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sweep or Wordware in 2026?+
Pick Sweep if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Wordware if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Most working teams running both can use Sweep for primary work and Wordware for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sweep and Wordware?+
Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30; Wordware starts at Freemium · from $29. Wordware is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sweep or Wordware?+
Sweep is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.