Microsoft's Open-Source-Multi-Agent-Framework — orchestriert Konversationen zwischen spezialisierten KI-Agenten.
CrewAI vs Dustwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing autonomous AI agents in collaborative crews.
CrewAI vs Dust — specs
| Spec | CrewAI | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 70 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Jan 2024 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 2
- Preise
- 10
- Reife
- 8
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 7
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
Pick CrewAI if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try CrewAI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick CrewAI or Dust in 2026?+
Pick CrewAI if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use CrewAI for primary work and Dust for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between CrewAI and Dust?+
CrewAI starts at Free · OSS; Dust starts at Subscription · from $29. CrewAI is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, CrewAI or Dust?+
CrewAI is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing CrewAI and Dust also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Multi-AgentTool-NutzungCodeausführungMemory
LangChain's zustandsbehaftetes Multi-Agent-Framework — graphbasierte Orchestrierung mit Persistenz und Human-in-the-Loop.
Multi-AgentTool-NutzungMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's leichtgewichtige Multi-Agent-Referenzimplementierung — Handoff- und Routine-Muster, zu Bildungszwecken.
Multi-AgentTool-Nutzung
Demo · hover to play