Plus de 7 000 intégrations d'applications et une couche d'agents IA — votre Stack d'automatisation existant, désormais doté de capacités de planification.
Lindy vs Mercorwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Lindy vs Mercor — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 63 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Voice, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 8
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 8
- Tarification
- 7
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 10
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 8
- Intégrations
- 4
- Tarification
- 4
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 6
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Pros & cons
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
- +$2B valuation — most-funded AI recruiting platform of 2025
- +AI-led sourcing → interview → contract → payment in a single stack
- +Strong specialization in knowledge-work and AI-evaluation roles
- −Marketplace model — talent quality varies significantly by role type
- −US-centric talent pool; international hiring is less mature
- −No public pricing — enterprise sales motion only
Pricing
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
- +Sourcing + interviewing agents
- +Contractor management
- +Payments
- +Unlimited roles
- +Custom rubrics
- +Strategic CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AIAGENTSPick Mercor if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Mercor →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Mercor in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Mercor if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Mercor for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Mercor?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Mercor starts at Subscription. Lindy is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Mercor?+
Mercor is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Lindy and Mercor also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool UseMemoryDemo · hover to play
Automatisation de Workflow visuelle avec agents IA — scénarios glisser-déposer sur 2 000+ applications.
Tool UseMemoryMulti-agentDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
Tool UseMemoryMulti-agentBrowser Use
Demo · hover to play