Adept vs Apollo.io AI: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Sales intelligence AI — 275M contact database plus AI sequences, dialer, and deal management.
Adept vs Apollo.io AI — specs
| Spec | Adept | Apollo.io AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $59 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 6
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Biggest contact database among self-serve sales platforms (275M+)
- +Bundles prospecting + dialer + sequences + CRM in one tool
- +AI features now genuinely useful — sequence generation and lead scoring
- −Data quality varies by region — strong US, weaker emerging markets
- −AI features less mature than dedicated tools (Regie, Lavender)
- −Self-serve pricing higher than competitors for full feature access
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +60 credits/mo
- +Basic search
- +Email sequencing
- +900 credits/user/mo
- +Verified mobile numbers
- +Workflows + AI sequences
- +Dialer
- +Conversation intelligence
- +Advanced reports
- +Custom roles
- +API access
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Pick Apollo.io AI if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Apollo.io AI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Apollo.io AI in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Apollo.io AI if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Apollo.io AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Apollo.io AI?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Apollo.io AI starts at Freemium · from $59. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Apollo.io AI?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.