Adept vs Clay: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Clay — specs
| Spec | Adept | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $149 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Browser, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
Which one should you pick?
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Adept →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Clay in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Clay if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Clay for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Clay?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Clay starts at Subscription · from $149. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Clay?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.