Adept vs Continue: 2026 comparison
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
Adept vs Continue — specs
| Spec | Adept | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Pricing
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Continue in 2026?+
Pick Adept if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Continue for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Continue?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Continue starts at Free · OSS. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Continue?+
Adept is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.