Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Capabilities
- Code
- Tool use
- Memory
Integrations
- IDE
- VS CodeJetBrains
- Version control
- GitHub
Pricing tiers
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Pros & cons
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Start with the open source tier. No credit card required for most agents.
User reviews
Write a review →Be the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
Alternatives to Continue
See all → Compare Continue vs GitHub Copilot →GitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemoryTry free →Affiliate Compare Continue vs Amazon Q →AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryTry free →Affiliate Compare Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody →Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryTry free →Affiliate Compare Continue vs Windsurf →Codeium's AI editor — Cascade agent flows alongside in-line completion and chat.
CodeTool useMemoryBrowserTry free →Affiliate